While Samsung is actively churning out Android devices, that doesn’t mean they are abandoning its home grown bada platform. Recently Samsung’s Wave 3 & Wave Y were spotted on IMCC, an online retailer with a price tag of RM999 and RM419 respectively. Both models run on bada 2.0 OS.
At first glance, the Wave 3 & Wave Y looks like a “bada”-ised version of the Galaxy W and Galaxy Y. Apart from its similar price tag, the Wave models are actually a notch higher than the Galaxy equivalent in terms of hardware.
The Samsung Wave 3 comes with a familiar 1.4GHz single core processor and 4GB of internal storage that’s expandable through micro SD. On the front, you get a larger 4.0″ Super AMOLED display that pushes 800×480 pixels resolution. In terms of imaging, it comes with a 5MP camera that does 720p HD videos and a front facing VGA camera. The Wave 3 is 9.9mm thin and comes with uni-body brushed aluminium design for a more upmarket feel. You can check out more angles of the device in the video below.
The Samsung Wave Y is a lower entry version into Bada OS and it runs on 832MHz processor and 150MB of internal storage which is expandable also with micro SD. In terms of display, the Wave Y comes with a 3.2″ TFT which does a decent 480×320 resolution. Over at the back, there’s a 2.0MP camera
If you are interested, head over to IMCC Wave 3 & Wave Y pages.
Wondering how does the bada experience looks like? Head after the break for demo video on the Wave 3.
Blog Topics
- health (1)
- Internship Report (30)
- Kapersky keys (1)
- On the spot movie (25)
- Premium Account (1)
- Tech (42)
- Tv-Shows (6)
Blog Archive
-
►
2013
(5)
- February 2013 (5)
-
►
2012
(1047)
- December 2012 (24)
- November 2012 (29)
- October 2012 (26)
- September 2012 (10)
- August 2012 (23)
- July 2012 (40)
- June 2012 (69)
- May 2012 (169)
- April 2012 (64)
- March 2012 (165)
- February 2012 (213)
- January 2012 (215)
-
▼
2011
(366)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (98)
- October 2011 (66)
- September 2011 (59)
- August 2011 (11)
- July 2011 (8)
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (1)
- March 2011 (12)
-
►
2010
(23)
- June 2010 (9)
- April 2010 (5)
- March 2010 (1)
- January 2010 (8)
-
►
2009
(103)
- December 2009 (15)
- November 2009 (6)
- October 2009 (17)
- September 2009 (4)
- August 2009 (23)
- July 2009 (18)
- June 2009 (8)
- May 2009 (12)